Negative Campaigning: Polemics against Brahmins in a Buddhist Sutta
نویسنده
چکیده
This paper takes a close look at the ways Brahmins are portrayed in one sutta of the Pāli canon that explains the ‘five ancient principles of Brahmins that today are seen in dogs, but not in Brahmins’. The paper analyses the method of comparing Brahmins with dogs and discusses the rhetorical purpose of this comparison by juxtaposing the respective statements with data from Brāhmaṇical law texts. In the course of this analysis three rhetorical techniques are identified (reductionism, exaggeration, and generalization), which Buddhists employed in their polemics against Brahmins.
منابع مشابه
Escaping the Inescapable: Changes in Buddhist Karma
Early Buddhist karma is an impersonal moral force that impartially and inevitably causes the consequences of actions to be visited upon the actor, especially determining their afterlife destination. The story of King Ajātasattu in the Pāli Samaññaphala Sutta, where not even the Buddha can intervene to save him, epitomizes the criterion of inescapability. Zoroastrian ethical thought runs along s...
متن کاملSelection of Discriminative Features for Translation Texts
Beginning in the first century AD, Buddhist texts underwent a series of translations during a period of nearly 1300 years. The identification of the translator, textual apocrypha, and translation style in Buddhist texts are always important issues. This study proposes an approach to find the most discriminative features that characterize the different Buddhist translation texts or other transla...
متن کاملPositive and Negative Campaigns in Primary and General Elections
We analyze positive and negative campaigning in primary and general elections. Positive campaigning builds a candidate’s reputation, while negative campaigning damages a rival’s. We provide explanations for why general campaigns are more negative: in the general election, winning primary candidates benefit only from positive primary campaigning; and negative campaigning by a primary loser impai...
متن کاملDivision of the Humanities and Social Sciences California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California 91125 Attack Politics: Who Goes Negative and Why?
I introduce a formal model of campaign strategy to show when candidates will engage in negative campaigning and how it can affect election results. The model separates campaign strategies by target (self or opponent) and dimension (issue or character), and defines negative campaigning as attacking one’s opponent on the character dimension. Whether candidates choose negative campaigning depends ...
متن کاملFilial Piety in Early Buddhism
Buddhist scholars like Kenneth Ch’en thought that filial piety was a special feature of Chinese Buddhism. Later, John Strong employed “popular Buddhist stories” to show that filial piety was also important in Indian Buddhism, but he asserted that it was “a Buddhist compromise with the Brāhmanical ethics of filiality operating at the popular level.” On the other hand, Gregory Schopen, who mainly...
متن کامل